Opened in 1936, the George Wright Golf Course is a Donald Ross design. It's reputed that 60,000 pounds of dynamite, 72,000 cubic yards of top soil and 57,000 linear feet of drainage pipe was used for its construction.



George Wright Golf Course
Opened in 1936, the George Wright Golf Course is a Donald Ross design. It's reputed that 60,000 pounds of dynamite, 72,000 cubic yards of top soil and 57,000 linear feet of drainage pipe was used for its construction.



5
Golf course restoration has blessed my era of armchair architects. As an Ohioan, I’ve been fortunate to reap the benefits at several notable projects near the movement’s fore, such as Keith Foster’s revealing at Moraine and the Inverness project that made Andrew Green the nation’s most in-demand Ross renovator. At the same time, big names like Tom Doak and Gil Hanse have overhauled municipal options such as Memorial Park (Houston) and The Park (West Palm). It is understandable then that we have set our restorative sights upon the Golden Age’s great municipals.
I once sat with that audience but, having played Ross’s George Wright, I have relaxed my aims. Wright, a course constructed by the roughest of hands (and dynamite), now sits in the gentle control of a management team that understands the value this land encompasses.
And oh, how it encompasses. To date, my favorite course – favorite, not best; the course that has spoken to me most intimately – has been Davenport Country Club in the foothills of the Mississippi. George Wright has been the nearest I’ve otherwise come to this topographic experience, where the land billows in great bursts and a great architect must steer his skipper in unconventional directions to reach port; it is easy to imagine Ross’s previous routing attempts lying discarded, the sheets of paper crumbled to resemble the hostile landscape.
So often the land directs the shot here, such as the speed slot for big hitters down the left side of the No. 16 par five, or the enormous dropoff off the right side of that hole’s perched green, daring the big hitter to go double-or-nothing. The fifth’s wide fairway, collapsing rightward into its dogleg, requires little skill to hold yet utmost skill to master, finding an even lie or visible angle in. No. 10 is perhaps the signature hole, demanding a detonated draw along hope-cancelling bunkers for all who wish to see the green upon approach. Your coward of a correspondent opted for the blind, 220-yard approach from the safer side of the fairway, next hitting down slope that evokes the roller coasters this same coward avoided as a child.
(As a tourist aside, if you failed to get tickets to a game at Fenway, a notoriously well-attended stadium, simply look backward at any number of holes here.)
There are, true, instances where perhaps even Ross gave up and just went with it; the fairway at No. 12 chutes an exaggerated bobsled run between steep outcroppings, as much a path for players to walk themselves from upper fairway-to-green as an actual strategic consideration. Hit more than 225 from the tee and cross your fingers.
Many have pondered what could happen should these greens be restored to the same scope and nuance as those at Inverness et al? It’s a whimsical exercise; the city of Boston can’t afford to shut down one of its mere two munis to execute such a plan, therefore we cannot make such demands. The current greens, on this land, would stand rival to a vanilla property with the best greens on the planet (a stance I’ll maintain until I receive the Chicago invitation).
The bunkers…they require no heavy work, unless you’ve landed in them. The shaping and upkeep make me envious for Manakiki, a Cleveland Ross offering, in my opinion, the best public round in Ohio, as things stand. Standing in sand ahead of the No. 4 green, a sincere six-feet deep, is to be buried in the Ross experience; Winchester can have Green’s pretty sharp-browed bunkers when he comes around for that club’s restoration but they are hardly necessary at every gosh-darn Rosstovation.
The updates at Wright continue to come in bite-size doses, which, perhaps, is actually for the best. The Golden Age saw too many grand courses immediately laid low by lackluster upkeep. Persistent pecking on the part of George Wright’s crew and consulting architect Mark Mungeam may not draw firework headlines like The-Park-West-Palm but it reflects an outlook that the city is looking long haul.
This review has spent inordinate time reflecting on upkeep practices perhaps, and I apologize for distracting from the unfiltered architectural merit of the plot, of which there is much. But in a world full of Bethpage Black apologists – who fail to acknowledge the strategic value of that course’s celebrated renovation is naked in its brutality – someone must stand on a Cambridge argillite outcropping and proclaim loyalty to a municipal king that actually wears clothes.
George Wright is he.
The latest ranking of the Top 100 Golf Courses in the World serves as the ultimate global golf bucket list. Most members of our World Top 100 Panel are seasoned golfers, each playing 20-30 of these courses annually while travelling extensively over decades to form their opinions on others. We recognise that opinions vary—even among our panel members. Rankings are subjective, and there are undoubtedly 50 or more courses in the UK and USA alone that could easily fit onto this list. Links Golf Pilgrimages The rankings
California, United States
New Jersey, United States
Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
New York, United States
New York, United States
Overall rating
4.0
Overall rating
4.0