St Andrews Road,
- +44 (0) 1797 363355
M20 J10, to New Romney
Contact in advance - after 3pm at weekends
Founded in 1888, Littlestone Golf Club is a classic remote links course, located on the fringe of the Romney Marshes, with the English Channel as the backdrop. The British Ladies’ Open was held at Littlestone six years after the course opened, which was originally designed by Laidlaw Purves, tweaked by James Braid at the turn of the 20th century and revised in the 1920s by Alister MacKenzie. Frank Pennink made some bunker modifications after the Second World War and Donald Steel and Peter Alliss advised on some minor changes in 2000.
Littlestone is a hidden gem, overshadowed by the other famous links courses in the area: Rye, Royal St George’s and Royal Cinque Ports. The course plays across fairly flat links land, although it does have its own range of sand dunes.
New Romney is one of the driest places in the British Isles; consequently you will rarely need your waterproofs. The dry flat ground makes for some interesting tight lies but rarely will you be faced with awkward stances. The greens are true and fast making it difficult to hold the ball.
There are no tricks here at Littlestone; everything is clearly in view from the tees (including a significant number of bunkers). You will need to be on top of your game to keep your score together – the last three holes are amongst the toughest around. Littlestone possesses numerous good golf holes and Bernard Darwin painted a particularly colourful picture of the 11th in his book, The Golf Courses of the British Isles:
“At the eleventh there is one of those uncomfortable tee-shots, which are so excellent. There is a canal, a nasty insidious serpentine beast of a canal, which winds its way along the left-hand side of the course, and it is our duty, in order to gain distance, to hug it as close as we dare; yet if we show ourselves the least bit too affectionate towards it, this ungrateful canal will assuredly engulf our ball to our utter destruction.”
At Littlestone, they like to get you around in about three hours (only singles, two-balls and foursomes were allowed, but the club does now allow limited fourball play). Littlestone is a delightfully good golf course that's well worth playing and, if you are feeling brave, they allow visitors to play from the medal tees.
I have always found the course a little bland and it's overshadowed by its more illustrious neighbours. It does have a couple of outstanding holes, which serve as a great test of skill, particularly when the wind picks up. The staff are friendly and it's certainly worth playing if you happen to be in the area.
Similar to Princes without the grandiose entrance and extra hospitality. A simple links design, challenging and fair, and in good condition when I played in winter. Will definitely return many times.
Standing on the 7th tee I was beginning to wonder what all the fuss was about. The first 6 holes while reasonable were fairly standard with limited character (except for the approach shot the second over the high dunes).
From the 7th onwards the course starts to take a different feel with some excellent holes cut into the fairly flat landscape. Some clever tee positioning also adds character and challenge to a number of holes.
The final 3 are as strong a finish as you’ll see anywhere and would look out of place on an Open Championship venue.
The greens were excellent with a true roll and consistent pace on every hole.
The back 9 really defines this course it’s just a pity the first 6 holes do not match its quality. Otherwise this would be much closer to Kent’s big 3.
I like Littlestone, but feel it's overrated. Theres a few good holes (2 and 17 being the best), but in general it's a lot of good/average holes o a flat piece of land. I think the fact it's a links on in the south-east helps it's reputation.
Worth playing if in the area, but I wouldn't travel to it. Play Rye, Sandwich and Deal, but skip Littlestone
Littlestone golf club unfortunately didn't quite live up to my expectations in all honesty. I'm quite surprised that its found its way into the top 100 in England as it really wasn't a very exciting golf course with a lot of uninspiring holes. One positive I must say is that they had good greens which were fairly quick and clearly maintained well so they were definitely top 100 worthy. However the course itself is not on the same level as any of the other links courses that I have played.
Some of the holes that I did enjoy would be the 2nd which was a good par 4 with the approach shot having to be played between 2 relatively large sand dunes. The 9th was also a good par 3 which was protected by many greenside bunkers but hard to keep it on the green full stop with how strong the wind was. The back nine was a bit more interesting than the front but also a lot harder as going towards the clubhouse sent us into the wind. The 14th is a good par 3 with a large bunker short right and an undulating green making it much more important to hit it in the right area. The 16th was in my opinion the hardest hole on the course being a 440 yard par 4 into the wind, playing like a par 5. Some hidden bunkers on the fairway makes this hole even more challenging. The 17th is about the only real great hole which is photo worthy. A beautiful 180 yard par 3 with what looked to be a church/clock tower in the background.
Overall it was a fairly average and flat course but it had some good holes in it so made it a good day out. A nice course to tick off the list and say that you have played but there are definitely better courses around.
Littlestone’s a fun and testing course but lacks some drama compared to Kent’s other links. There aren’t many dunes, the greens are interesting but not too wild, and bunkers aren’t often of the pot type. I liked it but it could use some improvements.
My favourite hole is the second, where you lay up short of a creek then play to a green nestles between multiple dunes. There weren’t many stand-out holes, not that that’s a bad thing as it was a consistent, solid exam with tough rough and plenty of greens where your ball would bounce away if hitting the wrong spot. The finish is as memorable as you’ve read, with the old clock tower adding to the sea views in that area.
I won’t be rushing back though… On the far side of the course the fairways were totally bald and cracked, except for some weeds sprouting. I like brown, firm conditions but it had gone too far. Strange also that nearer the clubhouse it was greener, maybe a drainage issue or perhaps the greenskeepers favour one area? Worse though were the bunkers. They had thick, heavy sand like I’ve never experienced. Not ideal but fine, you can adapt. However, on the brown half of the site all bunkers were totally infested by ants and flies! Honestly, the floors were moving and addressing your ball there were hundreds of flies tearing across your eyeline. After finding flies in our shirts and hair we agreed we’d just consider bunkers as ground under repair.
Perhaps conditions are harder to manage at the far end of Littlestone but green fees aren’t cheap. I read that they’re due a Mackenzie & Ebert renovation so I guess they are pooling resources for that, hopefully they took bug spray on their visits. I’ll probably revisit then but at the moment I’d say the shorter ‘Warren’ course is more enjoyable and better value.
It's a shame as Littlestone’s early impressions reminded me of Prince’s, understated but challenging, minimalist rather than wild and scoreable if you have a ‘fairway finder’ tee shot. Therefore for layout I’d give this 4.5, but its current state drags it down to the point it’s not worth travelling for. I’d like to think though that within a few years it will be back in ‘top 100’ condition.
Ranking is accurate; course is decent but with little wow ( flat topography and not close enough to the sea). I like the gentle opener as a design philosophy and the course has good variation. In terms of length and movement of holes. 16 ( long dog leg right to left par 4) and 17 (185 yard par three that plays downhill to a fabulous green complex) are outstanding holes that could grace one of the links monuments. Greens were excellent.
Cards on the table, I’m not the biggest fan of flat courses. If there aren’t strong features, land formations or elevation changes to command your attention then there’s only so much that can be done through course design and conditioning.
The first hole didn’t do much to inspire me, essentially a field with a few bunkers and less than 300 yards from tee to green, Littlestone gets underway with a birdie opportunity. What land movement there is, primarily comes across the stretch of ground which covers holes 2, 3, 16 and 17. The 2nd, the best hole on the front nine has a perpendicular ditch that should only impact the longest of hitters. This is closely followed by a dune that’s been carved in two, now creating two sandy mounds forming a gap that allows a sight-line to the green. Once over the blind drive at the next, the rest of the front nine is well designed, beautifully conditioned but largely pancake flat.
What Littlestone lacks in aesthetics, it makes up in design and strategy. The 5th has an intimidating line of bunkers that captures your attention off the tee whilst the redesigned bunker that pops up out of the ground to the left of the 6th green is an impressive example of bunker reshaping. Moving through the round, it’s a shame that the busy road on the 8th damages what would otherwise be one of the better holes across the opening nine.
Reinforcing what other reviewers have said, the back nine is a step up in quality from what’s basically an average links course for the front nine. The combination of burns, small dunes, run off and collection areas, and some high quality green complexes on this back nine are what people will enjoy at Littlestone. Highlights include a fantastic shelf and hollow to the left of the 15th green and the beautifully rumpled fairway on the lead up to the 16th, a dogleg hole that’s blind from the tee and features some well positioned centre-line bunkers that need avoiding along this most extraordinary of fairways.
Sadly, due to the sea wall, sea views aren’t available until you get to the tee of the 17th, a hole that delivers in every way imaginable. The par threes across Littlestone are probably the course’s best asset, but 17 is in a different league entirely. Teeing off from an elevated position, the golfer is faced with two bunkers 30-40 yards short, whilst a blow-out bunker to the left and revetted face bunker to the right guard the wide but shallow undulating green. The interest on the hole doesn’t stop there either, with a false front and wicked drop off to the rear and overlooked by a converted water tower, this is one of the best par threes I’ve played.
The closing hole then provides a pleasant finish and a chance to close with a birdie although the raised green offers plenty of protection; missing left or right on this hole effectively ends any opportunity to make a good score such is the degree of difficulty associated with a chip or sand shot from either side of the green.
Overall, whilst flat courses don’t really do it for me, they often bring out the best in the course architect and Littlestone offers a good example of this. Whilst I was a little disappointed in the front nine and overall, there are only a handful of truly memorable holes, the challenge offers questions of strategy most of the way around. And despite not being overly contoured, the green complexes are otherwise excellent. Considering I played in January, the putting surfaces were rolling beautifully for the time of year. The green staff at Littlestone have done a grand job as the bunkers too are faultless. Due to the lack of land movement, I’d agree that the rankings are correct and that the south coast courses at Hayling and Princes offer slightly more enjoyable days on the links, but Littlestone still has its merits and warrants visiting if you’re in the region and a fan of coastal links golf.
Littlestone golf club is a challenging but enjoyable links course. From a perspective of a ten year old golfer, playing from the yellow tees, I think the opening shots off the tee were mostly challenging. The first is a nice par 4 to open with but it gets more and more difficult as you go along for instance the 2nd green is surrounded by two large mounds about 50 yards from the green and there is a burn as well which makes a tough approach to the green.
This is a fun course to play but as I played it I noticed that the front nine is easier than the back nine. I thoroughly enjoyed the experience and would 100% recommend people who like links courses to go there. Just one quick thing 16 and 17 are probably 2 of the hardest holes because 16 is a dog-leg left and has a few hidden bunkers and a tricky green. 17 because it is a very well protected par 3 there are bunkers well placed around the green and some not as close.
In summary, I think that Littlestone is a marvellous links course. I think this because it has all the right features for a links and it is nice to play but it also tests your golfing ability. I definitely recommend this golf course.
Wonderful review Henry. I couldn't write like you do at 10 years old. I'm impressed and I also agree with your Littlestone thinking. It's spot on.
Firstly, many thanks to the Secretary for taking out 15 mins of her day the day before to rearrange some tee times and find me a spot in the first group. Played the course on a bright, sunny, cold morning Dec 28th. A little bit of wind but plenty of frost. My 7.20 tee time was delayed till 10.10 but was away with a likeable member in the first group.
The first hole is, well, a bit too gentle. I did pull my ball just off the fairway into the icy rough and given the backlog behind me there was no way I was going to spend more than a cursory glance looking for it. The second hole is a beauty, a burn cutting across for the strong drive and an opening between two large dunes to get to the green. This opening really was the opening to the rest of the course which I found to be interesting, well - shaped, great bunkering and greens. The par threes were fantastic and each hole had enough to make you think.
It does not have the drama of towering dunes, blind shots, large undulations etc but the land is a lot more interesting than what the 1st and 18th suggest. Not unlike Panmure in a way. There are plenty of mid sized dunes, dog legs and as mentioned the bunkers are well placed.
This course was surprisingly good. I knew it would be good as per the reviews on this website but I know at times this website, in my opinion, lauds too highly certain courses. I went into this course with the same expectation I had for Luffness New – that is, this should be good but ended up being a bit boring. That is not the case here and it’s a good 1.5 balls stronger than Luffness. It ranks with the likes of Panmure, Monifieth, Seacroft, Hayling – not into 6 ball territory but a solid 5 baller.
Warren from Aust