56130 Bad Ems,
- +49 (0) 2603 6541
6 km E of Koblenz
Welcome – contact in advance
Dr. Jürgen Kohns
Karl Hoffmann, Charles A. Mackenzie and Major Fahrenholtz
Yusuf Sari, Ingo Lehnert and Hermann-Josef Labonte
During the 1937 German Open, Henry Cotton played a round of 63 at Mittelrheinischer Golf Club in Bad Ems, the lowest score ever recorded in Germany up to that point. He would go on to win the tournament that year and the next two, making him the sole winner of this title at Bad Ems.
The course had been opened in 1930 and is the work of "Vereinigte Golfarchitekten", which was the moniker used by Karl Hoffmann, Charles A. Mackenzie and Major Fahrenholtz. It is one of the few classic courses in Germany that has preserved its old style character. Despite extensive renovations it still looks, feels and plays like a Golden Age layout – even its length of a little over 6,600 yards remains roughly the same as in Sir Henry's time. It certainly must be considered a rarity that the two recently introduced lakes look like they belong and even improve the hole strategies.
The routing moves about quite resolutely, but there are no exaggerated walks with the possible exception of a pleasant, albeit uphill stroll through the woods between the 15th and 16th. However, on the holes themselves the undulations come fully into play and there is hardly a level stance to be had. The terrain and the green complexes are challenging enough, so there has never been a need for elaborate bunkering and that may constitute the main difference to a Tom Simpson course (Bad Ems was erroneously attributed to him by Cornish & Whitten, which, if nothing else, can be worn as a badge of honour).Although the site is heavily wooded, the playing corridors are wide enough and the soil, while not sandy, is pretty good. Drama, excitement and strategic interest are all there, as is the variety that will keep a layout fresh for the members. It even succeeds in playing firm and fast in places. Fortunately there is no room for lengthening the holes, so hopefully no one will try to finally bring it up to "modern standards". As it is, the course is great fun to play for the average golfer and all but the very best players should find it sufficiently challenging as well.
Lovely golden age design. It rarely disappoints. This one seems fairly well preserved and having read about this afterwards, the newer holes (1955) fit in really well. The course is quirky, has a great variety, minimal but distinctive shaping and such a tranquil, classy vibe. The holes have a very nice flow, gently through the hills and the golfer can sometimes catch a great vista of the Rhine valley. Every holes seems to have its own charm, challenge or unique selling point.
In 2009, a number of holes has been renovated. Two artificial ponds were then created. Hole 3, which is a lovely short par 3, definitely hasn’t improved because it looks very artificial and does not blend in well with the rest. Sure it creates some intimidation interest, but this was just a mistake. I can forgive the pond on the down hill par 5 8th. Visually, it blends in nicely and it creates some interest off the tee as the fairway is very broad. It also makes the hole more stategically interesting as you must keep it short of the pond, especially in the dry summer. It protects the challenge of this mid length par 5 for the modern long hitting golfer. Lastly, I witnessed the pond to be made good use of, as the pond was used as an irrigation reservoir in the dry hot summer of 2020. Compared to the neighboring Jakobsberg, the conditions at Bad Ems were way better. Firm and fast with impeccable healthy greens. Hats off to the greenkeepers! MO
At the end of every year I look through my scorecards and invariably find that I have again managed to play this course only once. It's not far from where I live, it's accessible, it's affordable and it's an authentically maintained Golden Age layout. I love the course - but I also love Jakobsberg and Rhein-Wied, both less than 30 minutes away. For some reason the city of Koblenz is surrounded by three golf clubs and all three are among the best in the nation.
What strikes me most about Bad Ems is the variability of the holes: they are all different, they are all quirky (ok, except #14) and yet legitimate enough that the shark remains unjumped. Old-style courses sometimes have these idiosyncrasies that - charm notwithstanding - "seemed like a good idea at the time". Mostly by green committees that got cute and introduced features as an end unto themselves. There is nothing of the sort at Bad Ems. Everything here makes as much sense as the honesty box: if you don't have the exact amount, the clubs asks you to overpay and leave your bank details, so they can reimburse you for the difference.
The par 5 8th is a good example for a wild looking hole that perfectly computes, once you think it through. The included picture shows the landing zone. It's steeply downhill, so if you are a longhitter (or enjoy dry conditions and a career drive) you'll end up in the water. A gamble to get close to the pond pays off only when approaching from the left side. The trees on the right become progressively harder to clear, but if you lay too far back of them, you'll have a hell of a time carrying the hazard off a wicked downhill lie.
If you like unusual challenges, a classy atmosphere, a welcoming clubhouse and a decent score, when you play well, this is your place. (UM)