Pegasus - South Island - New Zealand

I played this course in October 16 and really enjoyed the occasion. It was a course that I had been looking forward to playing for some time. I had played Terrace Downs a couple of days earlier and rate Pegusas the better of the two. Pegasus strength is the protection that the greens have and for this reason it is important to hit your drive in the right place on the generous fairways. Yes there are different options to be considered off some tees.

There is plenty of variety of holes and the long par 5 18th is a killer at the end of the round especially if played into the wind and not to mention the near island two tier green which slopes towards the water!!

I cannot fully comment on the course as I only got to play the back nine (and take a peak at a further three of the front nine). I was trying to squeeze in 36 holes at two different courses before 3pm, but a sharp morning frost put paid to that idea….

Anyway, it feels safe to assume that Pegasus seems squarely aimed at having a wide appeal, particularly seeking to please the casual golfer (i.e. it is not too difficult, and there is plenty of room if you are not attempting to break 75). And I think the architect has made a decent fist of that, if that was indeed her intention.

The course has been billed as being from the strategic school, and I would agree that there are different ways to play many of the holes, depending on your handicap. I particularly liked the 15th and 16th holes, as both allowed a top player to be staring down a birdie from an aggressive well-hit drive, a more conservative par for the 10ish handicappers, and attainable bogey for those more accustomed to the good ol’ bogey train. The 15th is a highly original little number, a short to medium par 4 with two fairways that straddle some sunken wetlands. Crossing the fairway with your drive is definitely bold, and will leave an unencumbered wedge in. Play it safe off the tee, and you’ve still got those reeds to hurdle, with the green front sloping towards you, sucking those mis-hits back into the swamp. 16 is a par 5 that snakes back through those wetlands – again, a powerful (semi-blind) drive will leave the green there for the taking, but the water cuts across the fairway 20m short of the green, meaning that two pure hits will be essential.

I don’t think it could be seen as a national Top 10 course, for three main reasons. One – the land’s too flat. Two – putting surfaces, and the surrounding green complexes, do not hold enough interest, and are without idiosyncrasy. Three – it is perhaps only strategic in the sense that it can be played by all different skill levels. Hazards look ominous, and will certainly often catch any wild play, but only occasionally force any dilemmas, and can usually be avoided by any half-decent golfer looking to play it safe. The 10th is a good example of this – water all the way down the left, but acres of room to the right hand side off the tee. Perhaps a bunker front-right of the green would create some decisions – there is one, but it’s 12-15m short of the putting surface. Left me feeling that the challenge was a little diluted, and I’ll happily aim for the right semi-rough off the tee next time.

Overall, a proficient piece of work, an enjoyable round, in great condition, and flashes of true originality. However, like many forms of art that try to appeal to a wide base, it can leave the enthusiast a smidgen underwhelmed, and the top player preferring the sterner test at Clearwater. Nevertheless, it seems up there with the best in the area, and as with Clearwater, I’ll go for a kind 5-ball rating. Matt Richardson