Formed in 1909 as Maungakiekie Golf Club, Titirangi Golf Club, as it is now known, is the only course in New Zealand that can say it has Alister MacKenzie as its golf course architect. It was whilst MacKenzie was in Auckland in 1927 during a short fishing holiday to the country that he created drawings and designed a routing for the course which is still in use nearly 100 years later.
Towards the mid 1990s, the club realised the course was in need of an overhaul and Chris Pitman was contacted to redesign and remodel a number of holes. Millions of dollars later, much has been achieved – including tree removal, upgrading of the 15th hole and reconstruction of the 6th green. The renovation programme is now complete, confirming Titirangi’s reputation as one of Auckland’s best golf courses.
The achievement, with holes laid out over difficult terrain (due to the clay that covers much of the site), has received much critical acclaim; “the designer at Titirangi has done an outstanding job of which Alister MacKenzie, were he still with us, would, I am sure, be thrilled” was one such comment. Chris Pitman himself has said, “Like MacKenzie I believe a golf course should be a rendezvous with nature. If possible, you leave the land just the way it is and build holes as nature intended.”
Two of the four long par threes at Titirangi are exceptional holes. The tee box on the 187-yard 7th is located amongst tall pine trees but the tiered, sloping green is relatively exposed, making correct club selection critically important. The 203-yard 14th is all carry across native bush and a creek to a fast, undulating green protected by a bunker to the front right. A glow of satisfaction will be well earned if you mark a pair of threes on your scorecard for these two holes.
Chris Pitman – course architect commented as follows: “From an 18-hole master plan all the holes except three have been restored. Mainly greens, tees and fairway bunkering. MacKenzie's original sketches, still in the Club's archives, were followed together with carefully calculated estimates of what, in his style, his further input would have been had he remained longer in New Zealand.
There were no layout changes as his use of majestic site features was and is superlative. Detailed working drawings were painstakingly applied on site with dedicated course superintendent Steve Hookway as we delved into the MacKenzie mind and analyzed numerous pictures of his world-wide architectural success. I started my golfing life as a greenkeeper in 1963 at West Herts GC, a MacKenzie remodeled course near London. A subconscious appreciation of fine art had been sealed.”
the course is dry and so are the fairways and mostly also the t-boxes. the rotation of holes is confusing and using a cart you are too often disturbed by restrictions to drive although orientation is not easy for newcomers. the mere fact of a famous golf architect does not guarantee top ratings for lifetime.
There are in New Zealand only one MacKenzie course, and one Russell course. As a member of the one Russell course, Paraparaumu Beach, I was lucky enough to be invited to play the MacKenzie / Russell shield between the two clubs at Titiarangi. Let me say straight up, Titiarangi is not in the same class as the MacKenzie inspired courses in Melbourne. However, this does not detract from what a fine track it is. The club has faithfully restored the MacKenzie routing and philosophy, with lots of well placed bunkers, sloping greens and mostly wide fairways that require precision to find the best angle of attack. The par 3s are the standouts, all four pointing to different points of the compass and offering 4 very different challenges, up hill, down hill, over gullies and sloping tiered greens. On the other hand, the par fives are all par 4 and 1/2s, the sort the Augusta is famous for. Go for the green for the birdie, but miss and bogey is a good score.
This is an excellent members course, in the true MacKenzie fashion. You can knock the ball close to the green all day, chip and two putt, and be happy, but if you are looking for birdie you need to be on the correct angle of attack. If you get a chance to play it, and understand good golf architecture, you will have a great day out.
Titirangi Golf Club was originally formed in 1909, but the acclaimed course we know today only came into being when the legendary Dr Alister McKenzie visited Auckland in 1927. McKenzie was on a world wide tour, a tour which ultimately had a huge impact on golf design world wide with courses like Royal Melbourne and other sandbelt courses benefiting from his input.
At Titirangi he redesigned the course, suggesting a routing that used the natural terrain to wonderful effect. That routing remains intact today!
After some redesign work by Chris Pitman in the 1990's, the course has in recent years been given, and is still undergoing a facelift by Clyde Johnson, a young course designer based in St Andrews Scotland who did his internship with Tom Doak- and the results are impressive...
The land is not perfect for a golf course with some fairly flattish spots, mixed with some steeper undulations and ravines- which all made the routing of the course a real challenge if it were to remain interesting. So it’s a real credit to MacKenzie how good the course is considering those challenges.
This being my first visit to Titirangi, it was hard to guage what it was like a few years back before the renovations, but there looks to be some holes with noticeable improvements- such as the 2nd and the 8th holes with new bunkering and use of water hazards.
The white sand bunkering around the course looks fantastic and is a nice contrast to the craggy pines and green grass. This is particularly so on the par 4 18th hole with it's green surrounded by a swarm of Mackenzie-esk style bunkering.
I felt the only real weakness on the course is the treelined par 5 17th hole named 'highway'. I'm hoping some works in the future improve this rather unimpressive hole.
Overall Titirangi was a pleasure to play, and should be part of any golfing itinerary in the area.
Review by Peter Wood’s son, Rory. Peter is the founder of The Travelling Golfer – click the link to read the full review.
This is certainly one of the best courses in Auckland, a bit of a slow start with hole one and two but there after some truly excellent holes with 14 being one of the best par threes in the country. The weakness with this course is in the par 5s of which there are only two and both rather short. Also the finish is a rather lame dogleg par 4. Its a great example of a NZ parklands course and not bad value for money.
The layout at titirangi was very good and could see why it is rated so high. Unfortunately the condition of the course was extremely poor . The course was rammed with players for three days in a row as Auckland courses are due to tourists from overseas. This is know way a better course than many ranked below it and personally wouldn't rush back. I waited on every shot had bad lies on fairways aplenty. Serious golfers should avoid Auckland and play in central and south of the north island for the best courses and free flowing rounds
Utilising those original 1927 drawings and plans, the club has recently completed an extensive refurbishment. The objective of this comprehensive restoration program was to take the course back to the master’s original design. Mission accomplished – in grand style, thus reasserting Titirangi’s status as one of New Zealand’s pre-eminent courses.
A relatively short but strategically demanding layout which for decades, has sat comfortably in the upper echelon of New Zealand courses. Unfortunately, due to circumstances beyond our control, I didn’t get the opportunity to play the course but availed myself of the interesting and informative guided tour provided by the genial Director of Golf, Doug White.
Titirangi plays to a par 70 of at just over 6000 metres from the men’s black tees. Not overly long, but strategically strong, it carries an NZG slope rating of 127 and a CR of 72.00. Five sets of tees are on offer to ensure that players of all proficiency are well catered for.
The round commences with a pair of relatively mild par 4’s of just 282 and 290 metres, 18 and 10 respectively on the card. From there, strap yourself in as the strategic value of the master’s design now really comes to the fore. 3 is a strong par 4, followed by an outstanding par 3 of 169 metres. Then the first of the par 5’s, ‘Longfellow’, is a gradual right-hander – the intrinsic positioning of the fairway/greenside bunkering an absolute treat – calling for strategic and accurate play to and from the fairway. Get it wrong at your peril.
I consider the green complex at 13, ‘The Wrecker’ as possibly the best illustration of MacKenzie’s genius in presenting a great conclusion to a hole. A large, undulating, multi level putting surface, protected by strategically positioned greenside pots, again indicative of the Master’s classic bunkering. Just a treat.
As a general comment, the greens provide a tough but fair but assessment of your prowess with the flat stick. A great example of which is the tri-tiered 14th where a vast range of pin placements are at hand, and a bunt from above the hole, in almost every instance, will require at least two more.
Again, at the 187 metre, par 3, 14th signature hole below, calls for a nerve-wracking shot across a sea of local flora to a no bail-out, multi tiered green, aptly named, ‘Ramparts’. A visually, most attractive parkland setting, as picturesque as any I have encountered in my travels.
Fairways although somewhat ‘damp’ at the time, offered excellent cover and a bad lie through the green, unlikely. And, just to keep you honest, serious pre-shot consideration a prerequisite for play from the sometimes undulating fairways. The design variety of the holes is diverse and brilliantly laid out in this beautifully preserved natural bush setting. The reasonably lengthy par 3’s and several quite short par 4’s provide an interesting diversity to this layout. Indicative of such, the four par 3’s which play from each cardinal point of the compass. Write three on the card for each this clutch of holes and you have the makings of a good score. The conclusion to the round provides yet another graphic illustration of the art form that is the MacKenzie signature bunkering.
In conclusion, a quote from Chris Pitman, OIC of the TGC revamp if I may: “Like MacKenzie, I believe a golf course should be a rendezvous with nature. If possible, you leave the land just the way it is and build holes as nature intended.”
Just to quickly update on some slight changes in the last few years. Several approaches have been sandcarpeted over the final 20-30m before the green (#’s 6, 8, 12, 13, 17 and 18), partly to aid drainage, but also with the aim of introducing firmer and faster playing arenas, encouraging a running approach. More work is also planned (e.g the 3rd). Apparently, Alister MacKenzie visited Auckland in the summer, and unsurprisingly he had firm conditions in mind when he laid out the course. I am guessing that it has always been a challenge to maintain this type of surface, due to the clay base underneath, and I didn’t really get to appreciate the fruits of the club’s labour, as I played towards the end of a reasonably wet winter. In fact, I haven’t managed to play Titirangi in summer yet, so in many ways, I haven’t really tasted the full delights of the design yet, or really come to appreciate the strategy needed.
The other changes are on the 13th and 16th tee shots. Previously, both were hair-raising drives through chutes carved through the trees. Now, after some substantial tree removal, it is more open, particularly on 16, where the whole fairway is now visible. It must have changed how I thought about the entire hole, because I never really appreciated the beauty of the 16th green and surrounds the last time around. A wide but shallow surface, wedged into the right angled corner created by boundary fence and road, protected by a deep trough and a wickedly contoured bunker front left, all insisting on some sharp distance control with a short to mid iron.
Some visitors may be a little disconcerted by some of the extreme contours on the greens. We found two pin placements where it was literally impossible to lag your putt within 15 feet if you were above the hole – you had to hole it to get close, so to speak. I’ll not express too polar an opinion here, rather raise three questions: 1) isn’t it the pin placements that are severe, and not necessarily the greens? 2) as my playing partner so astutely pointed out, is golf necessarily meant to be fair? 3) it’s not exactly a secret that to play another extremely well-known MacKenzie course, you need to be below the hole or you’re in trouble. We see it on the TV every April, and it fascinates us, adding another layer to the excitement. Should you really feel let down if that same intricacy bites you on occasion? For me, it’s all in the game.
It’s Auckland’s top course in our rankings, and you won’t find me arguing with that. Matt Richardson