Austin Caperton Jnr established the Glade Springs resort in the early 1970s and he commissioned George Cobb to design the first course on the estate, now simply called the Cobb course.
Thirty years later, Tom Clark’s Stonehaven layout became the second 18-hole course on the property and such was the acclaim that greeted this course, he was asked to add another 18 holes. This layout, named Woodhaven, opened for play in 2010.
Developer Cooper Communities and resort operator Bright Enterprises were the companies that combined resources to put the Stonehaven course on the West Virginian map in 2003, entrusting architect Tom Clark with its design.
The developer had been involved with the Ault, Clark & Associates design group before (when constructing similar golf projects in Arkansas) so it was fully confidant that Tom Clark would deliver a spectacular mountain course, carving fairways through mature hardwood forest and cleverly incorporating the beautiful Chatham Lake into the out-and-back routing.
Clark has kept things as natural as possible on a layout that features many dramatic changes in elevation during the round. Particularly pleasing to the eye are the many waste bunkers which contrast brilliantly with the more traditional sand traps.
Rocky outcrops – more common in the likes of the Canadian Muskoka region – are another wonderful, distinctive feature to be found on many of the holes at Stonehaven and there’s plenty of this attractive stonework to be found on the layout’s signature hole, the 221-yard, par three 6th.
Tom Clark course architect commented as follows:
The course complements the existing “Cobb” course and is built not only to be a stand alone country club, but also to enhance surrounding home sites. We have very wide corridors, which allow the golfer to experience the beauty of the surrounds and not feel trapped between rows of houses.
The course is designed with non-returning nines, but a halfway house is provided, along with shelters at the farthest extremes of the routing. The topography is more dramatic than the Cobb course featuring striking rock outcroppings, and is carved through a forest of mature oak, maple, beech, and hickory along with huge rhododendrons for understory.
The course loops around both sides of a new 70-acre lake which also provides water as a source of irrigation. “Natural rock gardens” are planted with fescue and wildflowers, “waste areas” featuring black coal slag, and “native areas” enhance the strategy and playability of the course. Rock walls and outcroppings are the theme that runs through all 18 holes.
The greens are a selected variety of Bentgrass, and average around 6,000 square feet in area, featuring “bailout, chipping, and collection areas” around their periphery. Tees are Bentgrass and the length ranges from 7,228 yards from the black to 5,290 yards from the forward tees. Spacious Bentgrass fairways provide a year round green carpet from which to play, and they’re surrounded with a visually striking bluegrass rough.
We’re happy that Stonehaven has taken its place among the top facilities, not only in West Virginia, but the entire east coast.
The Stonehaven course is a composite of the Cobb and Woodhaven. The first hole is welcoming. It bends left with a fairway bunker on the right and a large greenside bunker left. The 2nd is a mid-length downhill par 3. Take at least one less club. The 3rd hole is a good birdie oppty. Large fairway with a fairway bunker left and three greenside bunkers, front right and two back right. The 4th is the number one handicap hole. It is long and requires three above average shots to find the putting service. It is a valley tee shot, so bombs away to a generous fairway. Favor the right side pretty much the whole way on this hole. For the 2nd shot stay right and away from the grey sand fairway bunker. This will set up a short attack iron to a green that has a wrap around water hazard on the left. The fifth is the shortest par four on the front. A decent drive will leave you with a flip wedge. Good birdie oppty. The 6th is a long valley par 3 with lots of rock outcrops. Don’t be intimidated, it is ok to hit driver. Number three handicap hole. The 7th is a par five is a well designed hole. Tight and bends right past the landing area. There are left and right fairway bunkers further tightening the tee lined hole. Favor the left off the tee and play it as a three shotter. There is a BAB front right. The 8th also leans right and is a par four that is only 90 yards shorter than the 7th. Another tight tree lined hole. The 9th looks tougher on the card than it is. Generous landing area with a downhill approach.
The back starts with the shortest par five. It is reachable, but you will have to hit two really good shots and have ice water in your veins as the green has a water hazard left. The 11th is a tight par four. Stay right of the grey fairway bunker on the left. You will have a long approach to a green tucked behind a ravine with bunkers on the right. Here come the birdie holes. The 12th is the shortest and easiest rated hole on the course. The 13th is the shortest par four, decent drive and flip wedge and you will be putting for birdie. The 14th is a backwards S par four. The right side is squeezed by fairway bunkers and the green has a large bunker left. The 15th has a couple of fairway bunkers left, favor right of center. The green has no bunkers. The 16th is a 600 plus yard downhill par five. Long and tight, favor the right side the hole way. The last par three is uphill, take an extra club. The finishing hole tilts left. Off the tee aim at the right fairway bunker to take the large left fairway bunker out of play.
Good course that I would play again.
So I really enjoyed my trip to Glade Springs, my brother and I both liked the Cobb course the best, but Stonehaven offered some fantastic views and topography. The conditioning was also pretty good but I wonder if they can keep up with it. It is on such a big property with lots of elevation and rock and gaps in between holes etc. With the price of the golf packages, I wonder if the profit is there to properly maintain this course for years to come.
Having said that, it was really pretty and also a lot of fun to play. I thought it was fair for the most part. There were a few quirky holes. The view driving the cart down to #16 was awesome. Big fan of Glade Springs especially for the cost. Its a great weekend trip and the staff was very friendly.
I really can’t share Mr Finn’s gushing enthusiasm which seems more marketing than reality. Stonehaven is good resort course (I’d rate it 4.5 out of 6), but it will never get a sniff at the US Top 100 and quite rightly so. When a reviewer rates a course like this so highly I have to wonder whether the reviewer is a marketer or simply ignorant.
Dear Niall. Thank you for taking the time to comment on my review however I strongly disagree that my opinion is biased. I have played over 800 golf courses worldwide and honestly believe that Stonehaven is one of the finest mountain courses that I have ever experienced. You may feel differently and that is your prerogative. I would welcome your own review on why you think differently.
I’ve just conducted a rigorous scientific study, and it appears Niall may have a point: For example 11/13 reviews of CANADIAN courses from Dave get a 6 ball rating. That does have a sniff of Tourist Board/Marketing employee about it...
Having said this, perhaps Dave is just more easily pleased than others - and really really really enjoys escaping for a round of golf
Dear BB. Thank you for chiming in. I have in fact rated 16 courses in Canada and 10 of them I gave a 6-ball rating, 4 at 5-ball and 2 @ 4-ball. In my opinion these courses are some of the best in Canada. I am not involved in destination marketing nor do I have any business relationship with these clubs. Perhaps I should be more critical in the future to appease the doubters. If you have played any of these courses I would welcome your review to compare with mine.
Dave, I meant to be disparaging, not because I have an axe to grind but to manage the expectations of others. As I’ve already mentioned, I’d rate the course around 4.5, so I think it’s a good course. My point is simply that your review reads like marketing puff when you mention the cost of packages and the quality of guest rooms and suites etc.
As good as the course may be, it’s not a world-beater in my opinion, but for a residential course with all the surrounding properties, the architect has done a good job of keeping the course front and center of the bricks and mortar.