New Seabury (Ocean) - Massachusetts - USA

The Club at New Seabury,
95 Shore Drive West,
Massachusetts (MA) 02649,

  • +1 508 539 8322

  • Jim Clay

  • William Mitchell

  • Andrew Stolze

Designed by William Mitchell, opening for play in 1962, the Ocean course at The Club at New Seabury has a split personality.

The Ocean’s outward nine loops down to the Nantucket Sound in dramatic fashion before the inward half doglegs its way through tree-lined corridors to the northeast of the clubhouse.

Bruce Hepner, former Renaissance man, has already renovated the Dunes, the club’s second course, and will complete a restoration of the Ocean course in 2020.
If the above article is inaccurate, please let us know by clicking here

Write a review

Reviews for New Seabury (Ocean)

Average Reviewers Score:
Description: Designed by William Mitchell, opening for play in 1962, the Ocean course at The Club at New Seabury has a split personality. Rating: 5.5 out of 10 Reviews: 2
Colin Braithwaite

New Seabury is currently being renovated with the goal of reopening later this year. As Mr. Ward previously indicated the nines have a different distinct feel and flavor. With a redesign under way, headed by Bruce Hepner, I am not sure how valid or valuable this review may be. I will provide a higher level perspective than normal. I love the first hole. Talk about welcoming, an S shaped 472 yard par five. Yes, the wind is blowing, but what a great way to get off to a good start. The signature holes are the excellent par 4s paralleling the ocean. My only issue with them is they are very similar. Comparable length, the cart path bisects the fairway at just about the same yardage and they both have right and left greenside bunkers. The fifth is another reachable par 5. Favor the right, even though there is a fairway bunker right as there is a large water hazard left. The 6th and 7th are unimaginative par 4s, fairway bunkers in the landing zones and greenside bunkers. The 9th is a demanding par 4 dogleg right with a greenside bunker right and a small pond left.

The back starts with a par 5 dogleg left. To have a chance ar getting home in two, bomb it over the left fairway bunker on the elbow. The 13th is also a dogleg left with a water hazard on the inside elbow. This is one of the tighter driving landing areas, pick your yardage carefully. The 14th is my favorite hole, mid-length par three that is surrounded by bunkers. I know I am transparent, birdie. The 15th is a tight S shaped par five that bends around two small water hazards to a green that is well protected, 3 bunkers left and one right. The last three holes are non-memorable.

Overall, an overpriced resort course that peaks way too early. I am hopeful about the redesign.

May 05, 2020
5 / 10
Reviewer Score:

Respond to above review
  Was this review helpful?
0 people found this review helpful

M. James Ward

The Mitchell design was clearly a major addition to the Cape Cod scene when it first opened in 1962 but over the course of time the layout became tired and the '60s design motif clearly was out of touch with a style that truly needed updating given its promising setting.

The course is a tale of two different presentations. The outward nine more aligned to the course's name with the 2nd and 3rd holes -- both strong par-4's -- are the only holes in all of Cape Cod situated immediately next to the ocean. The rest of the nine plays in an open area and wind velocities can vary dramatically.

The inward half is closeted in a tree line and the holes are literally sequestered from one another.

To say the two sides are radically different from one another is a major understatement of epic proportions.

To the facility's credit, the hiring of architect Bruce Hepner is a most promising situation. Hepner worked under Tom Doak before branching out on his own and it will quite interesting to see what shakes out from his efforts.

The course will be closing in September and not reopen till the end of May '20.

I was briefed on some of the key improvements that will happen and Hepner's work could very well radically change and improve the layout that exists now.

The key issue will be more than updating the design - it will be whether the layout can be prepared to create a legitimate firm and fast test where the bounce of the ball is a central dimension. Right now, the roll of the ball is fairly limited. Can Hepner do just that? Can management sustain that effort once the work is done?

The Ocean Course also needs a new name -- the intersection with the water is extremely limited and more of a marketing ploy than actual reality.

The two nines are clearly going to remain different but Hepner's task could very well set the stage for a "new" unveiling that can elevate the course to a heightened level it has yet to achieve.

We shall see.

M. James Ward

September 13, 2019
6 / 10
Reviewer Score:

Respond to above review
  Was this review helpful?
0 people found this review helpful