The Belfry needs little introduction: after all, the Brabazon course has played host to more Ryder Cups than any other. So it's not surprising that when they decided to build a third course to complement the Brabazon and Derby, it would come under serious scrutiny.
Opening for play in 1997, the Dave Thomas-designed PGA National course was the first course in Europe to carry PGA branding. It's a stern, challenging course, which has been built along distinct American lines. With four newly constructed lakes and extensive mounding providing separation between the fairways, the PGA National has clearly been built as a tournament course, with spectators in mind. Despite the fact that the course has been constructed on open farmland, there are a number of interesting elevation changes.
From the "James Braid" blue tees, the course stretches out to 7,053 yards, but from the "Harry Vardon" yellows, the layout becomes a manageable 6,153 yards. The key to scoring well is very much about avoiding the hazards. Water comes into play on eight holes and the bunkering – especially around the greens – is well thought out.
Played the PGA this morning, have to say very disappointing. The course routing is quite good and I have played it a few times before. The condition today was very poor, the greens were slow and had two or three strains of grass growing which need to be addressed. The bunker had not been raked and were in poor condition. The fairways were covered in weeds and not cut at all.
Finally they have shortened the 18 to make it a Micky mouse hole. Overall a poor golfing experience.
If you are playing the Brabazon I would strongly recommend you play one of the local member courses all of which are better than the PGA .
Played here yesterday and while it did not help because of the rain I am not sure I would have enjoyed it much in any condition. On top of this we were playing as a 3 ball and were paired up with someone. I don't like this at the best of times, I wouldn't go to a resturant and expect to be sat with strangers so why do it on a golf course, but with the world as it is right now I don't think this is acceptable.
In respect of the course I did like holes 2, 3 and 4 but that was it really and while the greens where in good condition, the bunkers all had weeds and grass growing in them and the tees were a mess. We also had holes where the tees were really far forward, on the 6th we had tees so far forward we were playing a 397 yard par 5 which I hit driver the pitching wedge to.
The course is very samey, a lot of people have mentioned that and it is quite forgettable and for the price we payed, £80, it is just not in anyway value for money.
Ok course. You don't go to the Belfry to play here.
The first time I played the Belfry Brabazon course the Derby course was still in existence. The Derby course was one of the 10 worst courses I have ever played so I was happy to see it go. Obviously that was a long time ago so when I returned more recently I did not give it a glance even though I had time to play it.
But I am always intrigued by a second course alongside a more famous course such as at Woodhall Spa....but per your review I likely would not play it. Care to elaborate on why it is merely "ok?"
Sorry, meant to say that I would not step foot on the Derby again but am intrigued by the National.....
The PGA National is the only PGA branded course in England and was built to represent more of an ‘inland links’ style appearance. It is set up to play hard and fast off the fairways, with quick undulating greens and is protected by some absolutely brutal and well-placed bunkers. You sense relatively quickly as you play away from the clubhouse and hotel that this is a very different course to the Brabazon – less established and more open to the environment – and yet the two courses complement each other well.
Similarly to the Brabazon, the front 9 on the PGA National has water featuring prominently on 3 of the first 4 holes, and whilst we played the course relatively aggressively (with not a huge amount of luck or wisdom for that matter), it is set up for you to really play strategic golf and not ‘YouTube golf’. A classic example of this is the 4th Hole – 360 yard par 4 - which has a lake that you need to fly over with your tee shot before then another lake beginning in front of the green. There is the smallest slither of fairway running alongside the second lake (easily reachable with driver off the tee as two of our fourball demonstrated; the other two of us lost our tee shots left in the scrub!) for the most accurate and confident of drivers, but clearly the play on this hole is a long iron / hybrid, followed by wedge / 9 iron in.
My only criticism of the PGA National course would be that once you get through the first 4 holes, there is very little to remember in terms of statement holes. For me there were only a couple that stood out: firstly the risk / reward par 4 14th hole that is a 90 degree dog leg right and with a good drive you can reach the green; and then finally the 18th hole which is a par 4 doing to the right, with a huge tree on the right side of the fairway pushing your tee shot left into two strategically placed bunkers. Aside from these two, the holes were challenging but a little non-descript.